Showing posts with label Alfred Fellows. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alfred Fellows. Show all posts

Wednesday, 12 January 2011

The Vegetarian Guest

By Alfred Fellows
from Macmillan's Magazine, 1:9 July 1906, pg. 670

11 pages about how to deal with a vegetarian guest in the early 1900s - things have not changed that much in 100 years!

Classification that Alfred proposed (although he admits a person may fall under two headings) - 

Vegetarian - abstains from poultry, fish, game, butchers meat .. for humanitarian motives
Inclusive (or Simple) Vegetarian - may eat cheese, milk, butter, maybe eggs.
Eggs-clusive (his spelling) Vegetarian - the above but no eggs
Non-Purin Vegetarian - A patient at Dr Alexander Haig's school of medicine - eats peas, lentils, mushrooms, eggs, and asparagus.
Literal (or Strict) Vegetarians - no animal products (nor let themselves be bullied into eating meat or products from animals.
Fruitarians - (this word existed in 1906?) - do not eat garden root vegetables - only fruit, nuts, cereals - some include milk, butter and cheese (call them Mixed Fruitarians? he wonders)
Occultists and Mystics - (jokingly?) those who only eat fruit and nuts and refuse food over which the fire has passed.  (raw foods)

Food Suggestions:
  • Make the guest's food look as close to other guests' food as possible, so as to not draw attention to his diet.
  • If serving fish, butterbean fritters could be made to look like fried sole.
  • Haricot chop - lentil steak
  • Savouries of peas, beans, or lentils
  • A chestnut dressing
  • use Cocoa-nut butter in puddings for fruitarians
"Another urgent counsel, - and once more, against preconceived notions -- rather give the vegetarian too little than too much of his special dishes.  The very foolish error that a vegetarian requires a sloppy diet of four times the bulk that a 'sensible person' takes dies hard, and leaves as a legacy the impression that he requires at least four times more food than the unconverted.  If he was so ill-advised as to try subsisting on potatoes and cabbages, probably he would; but on diet judiciously chosen he requires not more, but usually less than other people.  The old mistake lingers even in vegetarian restaurants."